The Individual Experience in a World of Categories :: Sociology Sociological Essays

The Individual Experience in a World of Categories Lakoff and Johnson contend for an epitomized mind, saying that our classes depend on how we experience the world through our bodies. As indicated by this hypothesis, because of their various life structures, people would encounter the world contrastingly and their classes would be intrinsically unique. Additionally, it would be normal that all ladies would have similar classifications. Our class and our conversations have exhibited a decent variety of assessments and techniques for order that disprove this piece of Lakoff and Johnson's contention. I imagine that Lakoff and Johnson were right in saying that the classifications we structure are a piece of our experience (Lakoff and Johnson 19). Nonetheless, what they fail to factor into their examination of the manner in which people sort is the distinctions of every individual experience. Classifications and their implications depend on a person's very own insight into the world, and that is the reason no class implies the very same thing for more than one person. I need to look at the classifications of race and sexuality in Moraga and Delany to exhibit the essentialness of the individual experience and its immediate association with classifications. Likewise, I need to recommend that race as other is more hazardous than sexuality to one's very own personality. Delany's Repugnance/Perversion/Diversion presents us with a progression of upsetting stories. They all begin inside Delany's life, yet his purpose behind picking these specific stories is exactly in light of the fact that they are unique (Delany 125). Indeed, even inside one's own individual experience, there is a uniqueness to occasions. The classification gay doesn't imply that the people who distinguish themselves as a feature of it will share a comprehension of all that it has intended for one individual to guarantee this name for himself/herself. Delany recognizes that the distinguishing proof with others that classes make is in a manner bogus, even the similitudes are at last, to the degree they are living ones, a play of contrasts (Delany 131). He stresses that a great part of the sexual experience stays outside of language. No everything will be shared, not all things can be. A person's excursion to guaranteeing his/her own character is settled in the individual excursion, in events both trademark and strange. Be that as it may, perhaps these strange stories are not as unique to his experience as Delany accepts. It is truth that they are without a doubt a piece of Delany's understanding as a gay man, and he says himself that there is no widespread gay experience.